Skip to main content

Kandace Edwards, ACLU, bail, forgery, Alabama

The American Civil Liberties Union posted on Facebook that "a woman who's 7 and-a-half months pregnant is jailed til June 5 (at least), only because she's too poor to afford bail."

 aclu facebook


The issue is the phrase "only because".  Edwards was not jailed because she could not afford bail.  Indeed, she would not have needed to pay bail had she not been jailed for forging a check.  Edwards was jailed for forgery, not for being unable to afford bail.

The ACLU and SPLC may make a solid case that the amount of bail was set too high.  There may be a case that the whole system is unfairly tilted against poor people, and that we should help our veterans more than we do.  All of that may be true and may be debated.  But the sequence of facts cannot be debated: Edwards was in jail for forgery, not for an inability to pay a bail that did not exist before she was arrested for forgery.

  Kandace Edwards has since been released.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Raul Labrador, Health care coverage, Death

Congressman Raul Labrador said "Nobody dies because they don't have access to health care."

This statement is false given that if you have cancer it can kill you unless you get care.  Consider some other scenarios in which access to health care could prevent death:


Snake biteCrocodile biteEbola virusWolf attackGunshot woundBroken neckDehydrationShark attack

Without access to health care, people suffering from any of the above may die.  Clearly, then, people do die when they don't have access to health care.

Healthcare, Tom Price, Insurance, Cost, Ecomomics

Tom Price here claims the new American Health Care Act will "bring down costs" and "will allow for more individuals to be covered".  The Congressional Budget Office projects that the number of uninsured under the AHCA will increase from 31 million this year to 52 million by 2026.

If the number of insured people decreases, costs for insurance should increase -- that is, at least, according to the traditional economic axiom of supply and demand.  If there will be greater demand for healthcare as people age and the population grows, and less available supply of coverage through insurance, one would expect prices to increase.

How can the bill "bring costs down" if the number of uninsured goes up?


Trump, Blumenthal, Comey, Vietnam, ad hominen, tu quo que

President Trump implies that Senator Blumenthal's comments on James Comey are irrelevant because of Blumenthal's previous incorrect statements about his own military service.  But whether Blumenthal misspoke or even lied is completely irrelevant to the current situation with the former Director of the FBI.

Trump is using an ad hominem attack against Blumenthal, and Trump is not addressing Blumenthal's position on Comey.  Trump is also committing something akin to tu quoque (directing criticism back on to Blumenthal on grounds of inconsistency to avoid criticizing the content of Blumenthal's argument), except that Blumenthal isn't making any claims related to the military.

Watching Senator Richard Blumenthal speak of Comey is a joke. "Richie" devised one of the greatest military frauds in U.S. history. For.... — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 10, 2017
Trump here appears to be "not even wrong", and his line on Blumenthal is not even very …