Skip to main content

Paid Family Leave Failure with Mika Brzezinski and Raúl Labrador

Brzezinski asks Labrador about paid family leave 6 times in the clip below.  After the first question, Labrador answers clearly that it's not for the government to insist that private businesses give paid leave.  After the second attempt, he says that he had a private business and he gave his employees paid leave, but that (again) he doesn't believe it should be mandated by government.  Brzezinski keeps pressing on this and getting variations of the same answers until Labrador reminds her that he wasn't invited on the show to talk about paid family leave.

Brzezinski is not willing to accept his answer -- that private business should be free to handle leave in the way they see fit, since they must find a way to pay for the leave themselves -- and is not willing to argue for her own position.  Her own position seems to be that government should mandate that private businesses offer paid family leave, but she does not make a case as to why she holds this position, or how the leave would be paid for and enforced.

The audience is let down by this exchange.  Brzezinski should have made her own case clearly, and not simply repeated a question to which she had received a fair and apparently earnest answer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Raul Labrador, Health care coverage, Death

Congressman Raul Labrador said "Nobody dies because they don't have access to health care."

This statement is false given that if you have cancer it can kill you unless you get care.  Consider some other scenarios in which access to health care could prevent death:


Snake biteCrocodile biteEbola virusWolf attackGunshot woundBroken neckDehydrationShark attack

Without access to health care, people suffering from any of the above may die.  Clearly, then, people do die when they don't have access to health care.

Healthcare, Tom Price, Insurance, Cost, Ecomomics

Tom Price here claims the new American Health Care Act will "bring down costs" and "will allow for more individuals to be covered".  The Congressional Budget Office projects that the number of uninsured under the AHCA will increase from 31 million this year to 52 million by 2026.

If the number of insured people decreases, costs for insurance should increase -- that is, at least, according to the traditional economic axiom of supply and demand.  If there will be greater demand for healthcare as people age and the population grows, and less available supply of coverage through insurance, one would expect prices to increase.

How can the bill "bring costs down" if the number of uninsured goes up?


Trump, Blumenthal, Comey, Vietnam, ad hominen, tu quo que

President Trump implies that Senator Blumenthal's comments on James Comey are irrelevant because of Blumenthal's previous incorrect statements about his own military service.  But whether Blumenthal misspoke or even lied is completely irrelevant to the current situation with the former Director of the FBI.

Trump is using an ad hominem attack against Blumenthal, and Trump is not addressing Blumenthal's position on Comey.  Trump is also committing something akin to tu quoque (directing criticism back on to Blumenthal on grounds of inconsistency to avoid criticizing the content of Blumenthal's argument), except that Blumenthal isn't making any claims related to the military.

Watching Senator Richard Blumenthal speak of Comey is a joke. "Richie" devised one of the greatest military frauds in U.S. history. For.... — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 10, 2017
Trump here appears to be "not even wrong", and his line on Blumenthal is not even very …